Conduct an Evidence Review Overview

Conduct an Evidence Review Overview:
• Identified 10 articles
• Then MUST complete the paper as clearly described in Sections 1-6 as below (with all the details as listed)

Case Study:
Background:

  • You are the Vice President of Human Resources Department of “the Company”
  • The company is a multi-national firm, that produces GPS
  • “The Company” ‘s current issue: decrease in staff retention
  • An interview with staff stating that there is: lacking work/life balance
  • Issue: Lack of Flexible working environment in the company
  • Aim: improve staff retention.

Section 1:
Purpose of the study (2 page)
It’s rationale (see paragraph A as below)
The research question:
What kind of HRM practices need to manipulate for work-life balance and flexible working environment to increase staff retention?

Section 2:
“Method” (no more than 2 pages), which MUST include:
• Method for identifying evidence
• Include databases searched
• Include specific search terms used
• Include exclusion and inclusion criteria

Section 3:
“Analysis and Synthesis” (no more than 8 pages), which MUST include:
• Provide characteristics of evidence
• Conduct a quality appraisal (as in Table 3 in Section 6, required)
• Synthesis of themes and patterns found within the 10 articles (list the CODES of the each 10 articles, as in Table 4 and 5, in Section 6, required, put the information of code, themes and patterns to Appendices)

Section 4:
“Recommendations: (no more than 5 pages), which MUST include:
• Recommendations for “The company”
• Recommendations for other companies facing similar situations
• Broader implications for management practice
• Broader implications for academic research and study limitations
• Conclusion (only a paragraph or so)

Section 5 : References (no page limit)

Section 6: Appendices (MUST DO)
Table 1: List of databases searched, to include search words, time period/range of articles (1 page)
Table 2: List of 10 articles used with some descriptive information (e.g., type of method, RQ, variables considered, findings) (2 page)
Table 3: Your results of a quality appraisal (1 page)
Table 4: List of CODES from each of the 10 articles (1 page)
Table 5: Unique themes identified from within each of the 10 articles, including a visual way to identify common themes across all or most or many of the 10 articles. (the codes and themes can be combined into one Table) (1 Page)
Figure 6: PRISMA flow chart ( 1 page)

Remarks;
• MUST use the framework of benchmark tool: TAPUPAS
• Make critical and objective observations of the characteristics of the studies that emerged from your evidence search, including, but not limited to, the following: the use of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods approach, the relative size of the dataset used to make findings, whether or not conclusive evidence exists with which to make findings, study limitations, other characteristics you deem pertinent

Other information required to be included in the paper:
Evidence Based management
• Benchmarking
• Best Practices
• Multiples sources
• Related to specific topic
• Transparent, eliminates variation and bias

Systematic Review Methodology
TAPUPAS dimensions:
Transparency (T), Accuracy (A),Accessibility (A), Specificity (S),Purposivity (P),Utility (U), Propriety(P)
High, medium or low

Evidence Based Management
Use of PICOC model: practical research questions
Population: Employee in Locus
Intervention: Flexible working environment
Comparison: Without Flexible working environment
Outcome: Staff retention
Context: Changing HRM practices

Leave a Reply