Personal CSR/Ethical Dilemma

Personal CSR/Ethical Dilemma

Description

Please describe a personal CSR related ethical dilemma you have recently faced or are currently facing. Use a dilemma from an organizational setting, such as work, school, an internship, or volunteer service.

First use the first 8 steps of the Steps of the Ethical Decision-Making Process we discussed in class to describe your dilemma, using only one to four sentences per step. These slides are posted on Canvas under files.

Following this initial analysis using the steps, then demonstrate a clear understanding of the Utilitarian, Deontological, and Virtue frameworks and their application to your specific dilemma.

You may consider the following questions for each framework:

-What aspects of your dilemma would this framework tell you to consider? Explain.

-How does this framework tell you to act when faced with this dilemma? Explain.

-Why did you act in a way that followed or rejected this framework? Explain.

Reflection: Finally, what have you learned from this analysis? Did using these frameworks raise new

issues or considerations? What do you think now about what you did? Would you do things

differently in the future? Why or why not?

For this assignment, please feel free to take a very formulaic approach to your writing. In fact, I’m fine if you look at the rubric and use this as your outline for each section, labeling each section with the rubric requirement…almost as if you’re answering a set of questions. Hopefully this will allow you to spend time on good decision insights rather than formulating nice reading transitions.

This assignment may not be longer than the equivalent of six double-spaced pages.

Personal Ethical Dilemma Rubric

Name:

Your grade was given based on the assignment performance in the following criteria:

Eight Steps (20 points possible)

A. 20 points. Does the paper adequately apply the 8 steps?

Utilitarianism (21 points possible)

A. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how this

framework affected awareness the ethical problem?

B. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how this

framework recommended a particular action?

C. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how the author

acted with or against this framework’s recommendation

and why?

Deontology (21 points possible)

A. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how this

framework affected awareness the ethical problem?

B. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how this

framework recommended a particular action?

C. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how the author

acted with or against this framework’s recommendation

and why?

Virtue (21 points possible)

A. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how this

framework affected awareness the ethical problem?

B. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how this

framework recommended a particular action?

C. 7 points. How well does the paper explain how the author

acted with or against this framework’s recommendation

and why?

Reflection (10 points possible)

A. 10 points. Does the author demonstrate reflective learning

from the analysis and application of the steps and

frameworks?

Style (7 points possible)

A. 3.5 points. Is the paper written in a clear and concise manner?

B. 3.5 points. Is the visual design of the paper effective?

Final Grade:

/100

Leave a Reply